Full LLM thinking from the 4-phase benchmark pipeline.
{
"service_type": "platform",
"base_url": "https://www.tsapi.net",
"auth_method": "none",
"auth_config": {},
"endpoints": [],
"pricing_model": {
"type": "free",
"details": {
"notes": "Listed as 'Free Forever', non-profit initiative, Creative Commons licensed specification"
}
},
"rate_limits": {},
"capabilities": [
"industry-standard specification for transferring survey data",
"API specification/documentation (see /docs/)",
"open source specification",
"Creative Commons licensing",
"non-profit governance",
"news and community updates (/news/)",
"sponsor/support program",
"contact/inquiry channel"
],
"raw_analysis": "TSAPI (tsapi.net) is NOT a conventional API service provider — it is a non-profit standards body. Its stated mission is 'to define, distribute & maintain an API standard for Transferring Survey data.' The site is a Next.js marketing/documentation site for a specification, not a hosted API with endpoints and keys.\n\nNature of the organization:\n- Non-profit initiative (not a commercial SaaS or data provider).\n- Publishes and maintains an open industry standard, licensed under Creative Commons and Open Source.\n- Badges and site copy emphasize: 'Free Forever', 'Open Source', 'Industry Standard', 'Creative Commons', 'Non-Profit'.\n\nWho it's for:\n- Survey/market research platforms, panel providers, data processors, and vendors who need a common format/interface for exchanging survey data between systems.\n- Implementers (developers at survey tool vendors) who would adopt the TSAPI spec in their own products.\n\nMaturity:\n- Positioning strongly suggests an established initiative (sponsors, news section, formal docs site at /docs/, explicit 'industry standard' claim).\n- However, from the landing page alone there is no verifiable evidence of adoption scale, published version numbers, governance committee, or release cadence — those would need to be confirmed from /docs/ and /news/.\n\nIntegrations / API surface:\n- No public REST API with endpoints, keys, or rate limits was discoverable from the landing page.\n- The deliverable is a specification + documentation (/docs/), intended to be implemented by third parties rather than called directly.\n- No authentication, no pricing tiers, no rate limits apply.\n\nPractical interpretation for a platform analyzer:\n- Treat as a reference/documentation platform, not an API to be crawled for live data.\n- Integration would mean conforming one's own survey data exchange to the TSAPI spec, not calling tsapi.net.\n\nRecommendation:\n- If a caller wants to consume live data, tsapi.net is not the right target.\n- If a caller wants to adopt a survey-data interchange standard, evaluate /docs/ for spec version, schema, and conformance details.\n- Confirm maturity (versions, adopters, sponsors) via the /docs/ and /news/ pages before treating it as a de facto standard."
}3/3 tests passed
| Test | Endpoint | Status | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|
| website_uptime | GET / | 200 | 569ms |
| robots_txt | GET /robots.txt | 200 | 494ms |
| llms_txt | GET /llms.txt | 200 | 497ms |
{
"overall": 62,
"dimensions": {
"token_efficiency": 8.0,
"first_try_success": 7.0,
"response_parseability": 6.0,
"error_clarity": 5.0,
"doc_quality": 6.0,
"auth_simplicity": 9.0,
"latency": 5.0,
"consistency": 6.0
},
"pricing_normalized": {
"model": "free",
"notes": "Free Forever, non-profit, Creative Commons licensed specification"
},
"issues": [
"robots_txt and llms_txt checks returned the HTML doctype instead of expected plain-text/markdown content, indicating these endpoints are not actually implemented (likely SPA catch-all fallbacks)",
"No security headers detected on responses",
"No public API endpoint exposed for querying the specification programmatically",
"Onboarding complexity unknown — no signup flow described (may be intentional for a spec project)",
"Latency ~500-570ms per request is acceptable but not fast"
],
"recommendations": [
"Serve a real /llms.txt so agents can quickly ingest the spec summary",
"Expose a machine-readable schema (JSON Schema or OpenAPI) endpoint separate from HTML docs",
"Return proper robots.txt plain text rather than the SPA fallback",
"Add security headers (HSTS, CSP, X-Content-Type-Options)",
"Provide a versioned, parseable endpoint (e.g. /spec/v1.json) for agent consumption"
]
}Show your live agent-readiness score on your own site. Free, no auth — it updates as your score changes.
<a href="https://prowl.world/service/tsapi">
<img src="https://prowl.world/badge/tsapi.svg" height="56" alt="Agent-readiness on Prowl">
</a>
See operational metrics, LLM evaluations, agent readiness, and more.
Open in Dashboard