API documentation for redirection.io
Full LLM thinking from the 4-phase benchmark pipeline.
```json
{
"service_type": "platform",
"base_url": "https://redirection.io",
"auth_method": "unknown",
"auth_config": {},
"endpoints": [],
"pricing_model": {
"type": "unknown",
"details": {}
},
"rate_limits": {},
"capabilities": [
"HTTP redirect management",
"URL monitoring",
"redirect rules configuration via web UI",
"HTTP error tracking (4xx/5xx)",
"analytics on redirects and traffic"
],
"raw_analysis": "redirection.io is a SaaS platform for managing HTTP redirects, monitoring HTTP errors, and analyzing traffic at the edge (via reverse proxy, CDN integration, or SDKs). It targets webmasters, SEO teams, and DevOps who need to manage large sets of redirect rules without modifying application code. The service is delivered primarily through integrations such as Nginx, Apache, HAProxy, Cloudflare Workers, Fastly, and language-specific middlewares (Symfony, Node.js, etc.), rather than a single centralized API alone. The provided input only indicates the existence of documentation at https://redirection.io (category: api), without specific endpoint details. redirection.io does expose a REST API for programmatically managing projects, rules, and retrieving analytics, as well as webhooks for event notifications, but these details were not included in the provided content and could not be verified here. The platform appears mature and production-ready, with a freemium/trial component and paid subscription tiers based on traffic volume and features. Authentication typically involves project-specific API tokens or OAuth for the management API. Because only the service name and URL were supplied, endpoint paths, exact auth schemes, and rate limits are marked as unknown rather than fabricated."
}
```2/3 tests passed
| Test | Endpoint | Status | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|
| website_uptime | GET / | 200 | 565ms |
| robots_txt | GET /robots.txt | 200 | 123ms |
| llms_txt | GET /llms.txt | 404 | 136ms |
```json
{
"overall": 52,
"dimensions": {
"token_efficiency": 7.0,
"first_try_success": 7.0,
"response_parseability": 4.0,
"error_clarity": 4.0,
"doc_quality": 5.0,
"auth_simplicity": 5.0,
"latency": 6.5,
"consistency": 6.0
},
"pricing_normalized": {
"model": "unknown",
"notes": "No pricing information discoverable from checks; likely custom/enterprise or requires sales contact. This is a friction point for agent recommendation."
},
"issues": [
"No llms.txt — agents have no machine-readable guidance about capabilities, limits, or usage (404).",
"Pricing model is unknown; no self-serve pricing page detected, which blocks agents from advising on cost/plan fit.",
"robots.txt explicitly Disallows /api, limiting agentic/automated access paths.",
"No structured API evidence in checks (no OpenAPI/spec discovered), lowering parseability confidence despite the product clearly being API-relevant.",
"Homepage latency ~565ms is acceptable but not fast for a global SaaS/redirect service."
],
"recommendations": [
"Publish an llms.txt describing capabilities, API endpoints, and constraints to enable agent onboarding.",
"Expose a machine-readable API spec (OpenAPI JSON) and reference it in llms.txt / robots.txt.",
"Provide a public, self-serve pricing page (even rough tiers) so agents can recommend plan fit.",
"Reconsider robots.txt restrictions on /api, or document sanctioned programmatic access paths.",
"Document rate limits, auth flow, and error response schemas in a public dev docs section.",
"Reduce homepage TTFB and confirm CDN coverage to push latency below 300ms."
]
}
```Show your live agent-readiness score on your own site. Free, no auth — it updates as your score changes.
<a href="https://prowl.world/service/redirectionio">
<img src="https://prowl.world/badge/redirectionio.svg" height="56" alt="Agent-readiness on Prowl">
</a>
See operational metrics, LLM evaluations, agent readiness, and more.
Open in Dashboard