Opiniated RAG for integrating GenAI in your apps 🧠 Focus on your product rather than the RAG. Easy integration in existing products with customisation! Any LLM: GPT4, Groq, Llama. Any Vectorstore:
Full LLM thinking from the 4-phase benchmark pipeline.
{
"service_type": "platform",
"base_url": "https://core.quivr.com",
"auth_method": "unknown",
"auth_config": {},
"endpoints": [],
"pricing_model": {
"type": "unknown",
"details": {}
},
"rate_limits": {},
"capabilities": [
"RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) backend for GenAI apps",
"LLM agnostic (GPT-4, Groq, Llama, etc.)",
"Vector store agnostic",
"Customizable RAG pipelines",
"Easy integration into existing products",
"Open-source developer tooling"
],
"raw_analysis": "Quivr (core.quivr.com) is an opinionated RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) platform/framework aimed at developers building GenAI features into their apps. Its pitch: 'Focus on your product rather than the RAG.' Key selling points are LLM agnosticism (GPT-4, Groq, Llama, and others) and vector store agnosticism, plus customization and easy integration into existing products. It is widely known as an open-source project (GitHub: QuivrHQ/quivr) with a managed cloud offering at core.quivr.com. Maturity: reasonably mature open-source project with active community; however the hosted 'core' product is younger. Target users: developers/teams integrating RAG into their applications without wanting to build the pipeline from scratch. Integrations: typically SDKs (Python/JS), REST API to the core service, and connectors to various LLMs and vector DBs. Public REST API: docs indicate a REST API for the core service, but exact endpoints, auth scheme, and rate limits are not specified in the provided content and would need to be confirmed from docs (likely API key / bearer token). Pricing: freemium-style for the hosted offering plus self-hostable open-source; exact tiers unknown. No concrete endpoint list, auth method, or rate limits were provided, so those fields are marked unknown/empty pending documentation review."
}1/3 tests passed
| Test | Endpoint | Status | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|
| website_uptime | GET / | 429 | 66ms |
| robots_txt | GET /robots.txt | 200 | 86ms |
| llms_txt | GET /llms.txt | 404 | 246ms |
{
"overall": 48,
"dimensions": {
"token_efficiency": 6.0,
"first_try_success": 4.0,
"response_parseability": 5.0,
"error_clarity": 4.0,
"doc_quality": 6.0,
"auth_simplicity": 3.0,
"latency": 9.0,
"consistency": 4.0
},
"pricing_normalized": {
"model": "unknown",
"notes": "No pricing page data available; cannot normalize to per-token or per-request cost"
},
"issues": [
"Homepage returned HTTP 429 with Cloudflare 'Just a moment...' interstitial — bot protection blocks agent access",
"No llms.txt (404) — agents cannot discover machine-readable platform summary",
"No pricing information discoverable; billing model unknown",
"robots.txt is generic Read the Docs autogenerated file, not platform-specific guidance",
"Website blocked by bot challenge means agent onboarding path is broken at step one"
],
"recommendations": [
"Expose a machine-readable /llms.txt or /ai.txt summarizing capabilities, auth, and pricing",
"Whitelist well-behaved agent user-agents or provide an API-based alternative to the marketing site",
"Publish a dedicated pricing page with structured data so agents can quote costs to users",
"Provide a self-serve signup path (magic link or Notlogin-style verified identity) instead of only enterprise gate",
"Add a status page or uptime signal so consistency can be assessed programmatically"
]
}Show your live agent-readiness score on your own site. Free, no auth — it updates as your score changes.
<a href="https://prowl.world/service/quivr">
<img src="https://prowl.world/badge/quivr.svg" height="56" alt="Agent-readiness on Prowl">
</a>
See operational metrics, LLM evaluations, agent readiness, and more.
Open in Dashboard