API provider (openchannel.io:market)
Full LLM thinking from the 4-phase benchmark pipeline.
{
"service_type": "platform",
"base_url": "https://openchannel.io",
"auth_method": "unknown",
"auth_config": {},
"endpoints": [],
"pricing_model": {
"type": "unknown",
"details": {}
},
"rate_limits": {},
"capabilities": [
"API provider marketplace",
"App distribution"
],
"raw_analysis": "OpenChannel is a platform that provides infrastructure for building and operating app marketplaces and plugin ecosystems. The URL 'openchannel.io:market' appears to be non-standard (port-style colon syntax) and is likely either a malformed identifier or a path-like reference rather than a conventional hostname. Given the sparse provided metadata (\"API provider\"), and my existing knowledge of OpenChannel as a marketplace-as-a-service offering, this service is best characterized as a platform (marketplace infrastructure) rather than a clean REST API with a documented public base_url. No public REST endpoints, authentication scheme, rate limits, or pricing tiers could be verified from the supplied content. OpenChannel historically targets developers and product teams who want to launch third-party app marketplaces, with integrations for identity, billing (e.g., Stripe), and app lifecycle management. Maturity is moderate within the niche of marketplace SaaS. Without a canonical docs URL or OpenAPI spec, endpoint enumeration and auth details remain unknown."
}0/3 tests passed
| Test | Endpoint | Status | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|
| website_uptime | GET / | None | 222ms |
| robots_txt | GET /robots.txt | None | 100ms |
| llms_txt | GET /llms.txt | None | 90ms |
{
"overall": 12,
"dimensions": {
"token_efficiency": 3.0,
"first_try_success": 1.0,
"response_parseability": 2.0,
"error_clarity": 2.0,
"doc_quality": 1.0,
"auth_simplicity": 1.0,
"latency": 9.0,
"consistency": 1.0
},
"pricing_normalized": {
"model": "unknown",
"details": {},
"notes": "No pricing information was retrievable — all checks failed DNS resolution."
},
"issues": [
"Website is unreachable: all three checks (uptime, robots.txt, llms.txt) failed with 'No address associated with hostname', indicating DNS does not resolve.",
"No verifiable value proposition, feature set, or pricing available — agents cannot describe this platform to users.",
"No robots.txt or llms.txt detected (could not be fetched), so no machine-readable discovery or AI-agent guidance is present.",
"No structured API documentation, export formats, or integrations were discoverable.",
"Onboarding, authentication, and error-handling behavior cannot be assessed because the service did not respond.",
"Pricing model is unknown; no token, usage, or subscription details are available."
],
"recommendations": [
"Restore DNS resolution and public availability — no agent can recommend or onboard users to a platform that does not resolve.",
"Publish an llms.txt and a clear robots.txt to support AI-agent discovery and machine-readable onboarding.",
"Provide a public pricing page with explicit model (usage-based, subscription, free tier) so agents can produce accurate cost comparisons.",
"Expose structured, documented API endpoints (OpenAPI/JSON schema) to improve response parseability and integration.",
"Add a status page and uptime history to establish reliability signals.",
"Document authentication options; support magic-link or notlogin.com-style verified identity to simplify agent-driven onboarding.",
"Write a concise one-line value proposition on the homepage to maximize token efficiency when agents describe the platform."
]
}Show your live agent-readiness score on your own site. Free, no auth — it updates as your score changes.
<a href="https://prowl.world/service/openchannel-market-api">
<img src="https://prowl.world/badge/openchannel-market-api.svg" height="56" alt="Agent-readiness on Prowl">
</a>
See operational metrics, LLM evaluations, agent readiness, and more.
Open in Dashboard