81
/100
prowl
Benchmarked Apr 06, 2026

OpenAI Evals

OpenAI's framework for evaluating LLMs and LLM systems. Open-source registry of benchmarks. Write custom evals to test different dimensions of model quality.

aitestingbenchmark platform_profile
Benchmark Your API

Score Breakdown

Latency 9/10
Auth Simplicity 9/10
Parseability 9/10
Consistency 8/10
Documentation 8/10
Error Clarity 8/10
Token Efficiency 8/10
First-Try Success 7/10

Benchmark Analysis Log

Full LLM thinking from the 4-phase benchmark pipeline.

Analyze
```json
{
  "service_type": "platform",
  "base_url": "https://github.com/openai/evals",
  "auth_method": "none",
  "auth_config": {},
  "endpoints": [],
  "pricing_model": {
    "type": "free",
    "details": {
      "cost": "Free and open source",
      "license": "MIT License (typical for OpenAI open source projects)"
    }
  },
  "rate_limits": {},
  "capabilities": [
    "LLM evaluation and benchmarking",
    "Custom evaluation creation",
    "Model performance comparison", 
    "Quality assessment across multiple dimensions",
    "Open-source benchmark registry",
    "Python framework for evaluation workflows",
    "Structured evaluation protocols",
    "Result logging and analysis",
    "Community-contributed evaluations",
    "Integration with OpenAI models",
    "Support for custom model evaluation"
  ],
  "raw_analysis": "OpenAI Evals is an open-source framework designed for evaluating large language models (LLMs) and LLM-based systems. As a GitHub-hosted platform, it serves as both a toolkit and a community registry of benchmarks for assessing model quality across various dimensions. The platform is primarily targeted at AI researchers, developers, and organizations building LLM applications who need systematic ways to measure and compare model performance. It's a mature, actively maintained project backed by OpenAI with significant community contributions. The framework allows users to write custom evaluations tailored to specific use cases, domains, or quality metrics beyond standard benchmarks. Key strengths include its extensibility, the growing registry of community-contributed evals, and direct integration with OpenAI's models. However, it requires Python programming knowledge and is more of a developer tool than a user-friendly interface. The platform supports various evaluation types from simple accuracy tests to complex multi-turn conversations and reasoning tasks. Integration capabilities include support for different model providers beyond OpenAI, custom scoring mechanisms, and result export for further analysis. This is essential infrastructure for anyone serious about LLM evaluation and quality assurance."
}
```
Execute

1/3 tests passed

TestEndpointStatusLatency
website_uptimeGET /200581ms
robots_txtGET /robots.txt40453ms
llms_txtGET /llms.txt40447ms
Interpret
{"multi_model": true, "models_used": ["openai", "claude_cli"], "model_scores": {"GPT-4o": {"overall": 84, "dimensions": {"token_efficiency": 8.5, "first_try_success": 6.5, "response_parseability": 9.0, "error_clarity": 7.5, "doc_quality": 8.0, "auth_simplicity": 9.5, "latency": 9.0, "consistency": 9.0}}, "Claude CLI": {"overall": 82, "dimensions": {"token_efficiency": 8.5, "first_try_success": 7.0, "response_parseability": 9.0, "error_clarity": 7.5, "doc_quality": 8.0, "auth_simplicity": 9.0, "latency": 8.5, "consistency": 8.0}}}, "averaged": true}

Agent Readiness

x402 Payments
Not supported
Streaming
No
Sandbox
None
Agent Auth
Unknown
SDKs
None listed
MCP Support
No

Want the full interactive view?

See operational metrics, LLM evaluations, agent readiness, and more.

Open in Dashboard