Finally launched a Multi-API suggest tool that I

{
  "service_type": "platform",
  "base_url": "https://freekeywordtool.net",
  "auth_method": "none",
  "auth_config": {},
  "endpoints": [],
  "pricing_model": {
    "type": "freemium",
    "details": {
      "free_tier": "Yes, basic keyword suggestions",
      "paid_tier": "Unknown, likely for advanced features or higher limits",
      "currency": "USD",
      "notes": "The site is named 'freekeywordtool', implying free access to core functionality, but may offer paid upgrades for premium features or volume."
    }
  },
  "rate_limits": {
    "unknown": "No documented rate limits found. As a tool aggregating multiple APIs, users should expect throttling or usage caps to protect upstream providers.",
    "free_tier_likely_limited": "Free users may face lower request quotas compared to paid users."
  },
  "capabilities": [
    "Multi-API keyword suggestion aggregation",
    "Google Keyword Tool alternative",
    "SEO keyword research",
    "Query-based keyword suggestions",
    "Web-based interface for keyword lookup",
    "Developer-oriented tool (likely provides API access or integrates with APIs)",
    "Supports query parameters (e.g., /query/hacker) to fetch suggestions",
    "Potential integration with multiple search engines (Google, Bing, etc.)",
    "Lightweight tool for quick keyword ideation"
  ],
  "raw_analysis": "The platform is a keyword suggestion tool that aggregates results from multiple APIs to provide keyword ideas, marketed as a 'hacked together' solution by its developer. It is a niche developer tool aimed at SEO specialists, content marketers, and indie developers who need quick keyword suggestions without relying on a single provider. The site is named 'freekeywordtool' and appears to be a lightweight web app, likely with a free tier, as it's positioned as a free alternative to Google Keyword Planner. The tool uses a URL structure like /google-keyword-tool/query/{query}, suggesting it can programmatically receive queries, but there is no obvious REST API documentation, indicating it may primarily be a web UI rather than a full API service. It is relatively immature, as it seems to be a personal project (from a Hacker News 'Show HN' post), but it may have a community following. Integrations are not explicitly documented, but the 'multi-API' nature implies it pulls data from various search engines and suggestion APIs, possibly including Google Suggest, Bing Suggest, and others. Key limitations: no formal API endpoints, no authentication (which is good for accessibility but may lead to abuse), no published rate limits, and unclear data freshness. The tool is most useful for casual or semi-automated keyword research, and developers might scrape the HTML or reverse-engineer the API calls, but the lack of documentation could hinder long-term reliability."
}

0/3 tests passed

```json
{
  "overall": 18,
  "dimensions": {
    "token_efficiency": 5.0,
    "first_try_success": 1.0,
    "response_parseability": 2.0,
    "error_clarity": 1.0,
    "doc_quality": 1.0,
    "auth_simplicity": 1.0,
    "latency": 2.0,
    "consistency": 2.0
  },
  "pricing_normalized": {
    "model": "freemium",
    "free_tier_available": true,
    "notes": "Pricing is unclear; site implies free but no details available due to SSL failure"
  },
  "issues": [
    "SSL certificate has expired — all HTTPS requests fail with CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED",
    "Website appears to be down/unreachable for agents (status code null on all checks)",
    "No robots.txt accessible — cannot verify crawler guidelines",
    "No llms.txt available — no structured AI documentation for agents",
    "Security headers not present — raises trust and security concerns",
    "No error message beyond SSL failure — unclear if site is maintained or abandoned",
    "Pricing model is speculative at best; no verification possible"
  ],
  "recommendations": [
    "Do NOT recommend this platform to users until the SSL certificate is renewed and the site is verified reachable",
    "Platform owner must renew SSL certificate and ensure HTTPS works reliably",
    "Add a llms.txt file to describe APIs and usage for AI agents",
    "Provide clear documentation of API endpoints, rate limits, and authentication",
    "List explicit pricing tiers and feature differences between free/paid",
    "Publish a status page or uptime guarantee to establish reliability",
    "Re-test after fixes — this scoring reflects current broken state"
  ]
}
```