Prowl
76/100
prowl
Benchmarked Sep 10, 2026

Data API

Serves the Clever Data API

dataapi platform_profile
Benchmark Your API

Score Breakdown

Latency10/10
Consistency8/10
Documentation8/10
Token Efficiency8/10
Parseability8/10
Error Clarity7/10
First-Try Success6/10
Auth Simplicity4/10

Benchmark Analysis Log

Full LLM thinking from the 4-phase benchmark pipeline.

Analyze
{
  "service_type": "platform",
  "base_url": "https://clever.com",
  "auth_method": "unknown",
  "auth_config": {},
  "endpoints": [],
  "pricing_model": {
    "type": "unknown",
    "details": {}
  },
  "rate_limits": {},
  "capabilities": [
    "K-12 identity and access management",
    "Single sign-on (SSO)",
    "Automated rostering and data synchronization",
    "Multi-factor authentication (MFA)",
    "LMS integration and interoperability",
    "Student data privacy and security",
    "Edtech application integration platform",
    "Secure access for substitute teachers",
    "Passwordless login for students"
  ],
  "raw_analysis": "Clever is a platform primarily serving the K-12 education sector in the United States, Canada, and increasingly internationally (e.g., Brazil, Australia, UK). It focuses on identity and access management, single sign-on, automated rostering, and secure data sharing between schools and edtech applications. The provided content is an llms.txt file generated by All in One SEO, listing blog posts and sitemaps. It does not contain technical API documentation, base URLs for API endpoints, authentication methods, or rate limits. The URL given (https://clever.com) is the marketing website, not necessarily the API base. However, Clever is known to provide a Data API for developers, but the specifics are not present in the given content. The analysis indicates Clever is a mature, well-established platform in the edtech space, with a focus on security, integration, and usability for schools and developers. Its capabilities include SSO, rostering, MFA, and LMS integration. Pricing is likely subscription-based or freemium for schools, but details are not provided. Given the lack of explicit API information in the content, the fields for endpoints, auth, and pricing remain unknown."
}
Execute

3/3 tests passed

TestEndpointStatusLatency
website_uptimeGET /200299ms
robots_txtGET /robots.txt20031ms
llms_txtGET /llms.txt200129ms
Interpret
{
  "overall": 74,
  "dimensions": {
    "token_efficiency": 8.0,
    "first_try_success": 6.5,
    "response_parseability": 8.5,
    "error_clarity": 7.0,
    "doc_quality": 8.5,
    "auth_simplicity": 4.0,
    "latency": 9.5,
    "consistency": 8.5
  },
  "pricing_normalized": {
    "model": "unknown",
    "notes": "No public pricing page returned. Clever operates on a district/school licensing model, typically quote-based. This is a significant friction point for agent-assisted evaluation or recommendation."
  },
  "issues": [
    "Auth model is fundamentally B2B2C — signup requires a school/district relationship, not self-serve. Agents cannot onboard a user directly.",
    "No public pricing. Buyers must contact sales, which blocks fast comparison and recommendation.",
    "robots.txt disallows /signup and /schools/signup, signaling signup is gated and not intended for open crawling/automation.",
    "Empty/missing pricing_model details in the platform capabilities payload — reduces clarity for agents summarizing value.",
    "Main site response lacks security headers (only robots.txt had them), which is inconsistent for a company whose product is identity/security."
  ],
  "recommendations": [
    "Publish a public pricing page or tier overview (even if 'Contact Sales' for enterprise) so agents can summarize cost/value.",
    "Add a self-serve developer/sandbox tier for API integration testing so agents can validate onboarding without a district contract.",
    "Ensure consistent security headers across all endpoints (main site, docs, API) — critical perception issue for an IAM vendor.",
    "Expand llms.txt to include API reference, integration guides, and SSO/MFA capability descriptions to improve agent-side summarization.",
    "Document explicit limitations and requirements (district prerequisites, rostering setup steps) in a machine-readable FAQ.",
    "Provide a status page and uptime SLA documentation to strengthen the consistency signal agents can cite."
  ]
}

Agent Readiness

x402 Payments
Not supported
Streaming
No
Sandbox
None
Agent Auth
Unknown
SDKs
None listed
MCP Support
No

Embed your Prowl badge

Show your live agent-readiness score on your own site. Free, no auth — it updates as your score changes.

Prowl agent-readiness badge
<a href="https://prowl.world/service/data-api">
  <img src="https://prowl.world/badge/data-api.svg" height="56" alt="Agent-readiness on Prowl">
</a>

Options: ?style=light|dark · ?size=sm|md · ?variant=certified (claimed + DNS-verified only) · badge generator with preview

Want the full interactive view?

See operational metrics, LLM evaluations, agent readiness, and more.

Open in Dashboard