This OpenAPI describes the API exposed by the contract.fit backend. ## Security ### Authentication All endpoints are protected: you need to make authenticated calls. There are 3 authentication mech
Full LLM thinking from the 4-phase benchmark pipeline.
{
"service_type": "platform",
"base_url": "https://contract-p.fit",
"auth_method": "none",
"auth_config": {},
"endpoints": [],
"pricing_model": {"type": "unknown", "details": {}},
"rate_limits": {},
"capabilities": ["contract management", "contract lifecycle management", "api access", "identity management"],
"raw_analysis": "The provided data appears to be a mixed fragment: a title 'Contract.fit API' with URL contract-p.fit, a brief mention of an OpenAPI description and authentication, and a large chunk of HTML content from 'Liberty IDP' by Netcall - a tenant login page. The HTML shows a Next.js application for Liberty IDP, which is an identity provider tool, but it seems separate from the Contract.fit API description. The actual Contract.fit API details are minimal: only that it is an OpenAPI-described API, all endpoints are protected, and there are three authentication mechanisms (though not enumerated). The provided HTML is not an OpenAPI spec; it's a login page for Liberty IDP, which might be used for authentication to contract.fit. Due to lack of endpoint list, pricing, and rate limit info, this assessment is incomplete. Contract.fit appears to be a contract management platform, based on the domain name and the 'fit' branding, but the provided content is insufficient for a detailed analysis. The identity provider (Liberty IDP by Netcall) suggests enterprise-grade authentication. The platform likely serves businesses needing automated contract handling and integrates via API with custom identity providers."
}3/3 tests passed
| Test | Endpoint | Status | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|
| website_uptime | GET / | 200 | 1035ms |
| robots_txt | GET /robots.txt | 200 | 490ms |
| llms_txt | GET /llms.txt | 200 | 492ms |
```json
{
"overall": 42,
"dimensions": {
"token_efficiency": 4.5,
"first_try_success": 5.0,
"response_parseability": 3.0,
"error_clarity": 4.0,
"doc_quality": 3.5,
"auth_simplicity": 5.0,
"latency": 6.5,
"consistency": 5.5
},
"pricing_normalized": {
"model": "unknown",
"notes": "No pricing information available from provided data"
},
"issues": [
"No robots.txt or llms.txt files detected - all three checks returned the same HTML page content",
"Pricing model is unknown, making it difficult to assess value proposition",
"No structured API documentation or LLM-friendly endpoints discovered",
"Contract management is a niche capability but unclear how it differentiates from competitors",
"Website response time of ~1s suggests moderate performance but not optimized for agents"
],
"recommendations": [
"Add a robots.txt file to indicate crawlable areas and provide llms.txt for AI agent discoverability",
"Publish clear pricing tiers and API documentation to improve agent evaluation",
"Implement structured data outputs (JSON-LD, OpenAPI specs) for better response parseability",
"Include getting started guides and use-case examples in docs to improve first-try success",
"Reduce homepage payload or add caching to improve latency closer to <500ms"
]
}
```Show your live agent-readiness score on your own site. Free, no auth — it updates as your score changes.
<a href="https://prowl.world/service/contractfit-api">
<img src="https://prowl.world/badge/contractfit-api.svg" height="56" alt="Agent-readiness on Prowl">
</a>
See operational metrics, LLM evaluations, agent readiness, and more.
Open in Dashboard