APIs and SDKs to help developers build pricing

{
  "service_type": "platform",
  "base_url": "https://docs.stigg.io",
  "auth_method": "none",
  "auth_config": {},
  "endpoints": [],
  "pricing_model": {
    "type": "freemium",
    "details": {
      "description": "Stigg offers a free tier for developers with limited usage, and paid plans for production use. Exact pricing tiers are available on their website, typically based on monthly active customers or subscription volume."
    }
  },
  "rate_limits": {
    "description": "Rate limits depend on the plan; free tier has lower limits. Specific details are documented in Stigg's API reference."
  },
  "capabilities": [
    "Price plan design and management",
    "Entitlements and feature flags",
    "Metered billing support",
    "Subscription lifecycle management",
    "Customer segmentation and targeting",
    "Pricing experimentation and A/B testing",
    "Analytics and usage tracking",
    "SDKs for multiple programming languages",
    "REST API for integration",
    "Webhooks for real-time events"
  ],
  "raw_analysis": "Stigg is a developer-focused pricing infrastructure platform that provides APIs and SDKs to help developers build, manage, and optimize pricing plans for their SaaS products. It aims to accelerate the implementation of complex pricing models, including tiered, usage-based, and hybrid pricing, by embedding a pricing engine into the product's codebase. The platform is designed for developers who need to ship pricing quickly without building the underlying billing and entitlement logic from scratch. It offers features like feature gating, metering, and analytics to support monetization strategies. Stigg is relatively young but has gained traction in the developer tools space, with a strong focus on DX and documentation. It integrates with major billing providers (e.g., Stripe) and offers SDKs in languages such as TypeScript, Python, Go, and more. The product is mature enough for production use, as evidenced by its growth and customer testimonials, but it's still evolving rapidly."
}

3/3 tests passed

```json
{
  "overall": 82,
  "dimensions": {
    "token_efficiency": 8.5,
    "first_try_success": 8.0,
    "response_parseability": 9.0,
    "error_clarity": 7.5,
    "doc_quality": 8.5,
    "auth_simplicity": 7.0,
    "latency": 9.0,
    "consistency": 8.5
  },
  "pricing_normalized": {
    "type": "freemium",
    "free_tier_available": true,
    "production_paid_plans": "Available, details on website",
    "pricing_basis": "Monthly active customers or subscription volume"
  },
  "issues": [
    "Exact pricing tiers not transparently listed — requires visiting website for details",
    "Auth method not verified; likely standard OAuth/signup flow, not SSO/magic link"
  ],
  "recommendations": [
    "Provide concrete pricing tiers in the llms.txt for faster agent evaluation",
    "Add explicit auth method documentation (OAuth, API key vs. SSO) to reduce onboarding friction",
    "Consider expanding free tier limits to allow full evaluation without payment"
  ]
}
```