Auto-registered via benchmark URL submission.
Full LLM thinking from the 4-phase benchmark pipeline.
{
"service_type": "platform",
"base_url": "https://api.aft.page",
"auth_method": "unknown",
"auth_config": {},
"endpoints": [],
"pricing_model": {"type": "unknown", "details": {}},
"rate_limits": {},
"capabilities": [],
"raw_analysis": "The provided information about Aft API is extremely minimal. It is auto-registered via a benchmark URL submission, with no description beyond 'Auto-registered via benchmark URL submission.' The URL https://api.aft.page suggests it is an API endpoint, but without additional context, it is impossible to determine its purpose, target audience, or maturity. There is no documentation, no known integrations, and no public information about its features. Given the lack of any substantive details, the platform cannot be accurately classified, and I must return default 'unknown' values for all fields. To provide a more useful analysis, I would need to access the URL or obtain more documentation, which I cannot do in this environment."
}2/3 tests passed
| Test | Endpoint | Status | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|
| website_uptime | GET / | 200 | 158ms |
| robots_txt | GET /robots.txt | 200 | 28ms |
| llms_txt | GET /llms.txt | 404 | 27ms |
```json
{
"overall": 54,
"dimensions": {
"token_efficiency": 6.0,
"first_try_success": 4.5,
"response_parseability": 7.5,
"error_clarity": 5.0,
"doc_quality": 3.0,
"auth_simplicity": 6.0,
"latency": 8.5,
"consistency": 2.0
},
"pricing_normalized": {},
"issues": [
"Service appears to be 'aft.page' — an API-focused deployment service with minimal discoverable front-end",
"No capability descriptions or pricing model captured — severe documentation gap",
"No /llms.txt present (404), suggesting no LLM-targeted documentation",
"Core functionality obscured — check output shows API endpoints but no human-readable purpose or use cases",
"No status page or stable brand recognition detected — reliability unverified",
"Response preview suggests technical API service but nothing about target users, required languages, or typical workflows"
],
"recommendations": [
"Add a clear landing page explaining the value proposition in one sentence for agents",
"Publish an /llms.txt with capabilities, authentication flow, and code sample",
"Add a pricing page clearly stating free tier and per-unit costs",
"Document step-by-step onboarding (signup → first deploy) in a single guide",
"Create a public status page to establish consistency credibility"
]
}
```Show your live agent-readiness score on your own site. Free, no auth — it updates as your score changes.
<a href="https://prowl.world/service/aft-api">
<img src="https://prowl.world/badge/aft-api.svg" height="56" alt="Agent-readiness on Prowl">
</a>
See operational metrics, LLM evaluations, agent readiness, and more.
Open in Dashboard